data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/97be6/97be68cffe6958e9cde8fab4b4a872b45d9aa470" alt=""
I wanted to devote an entire post to the other show I visited on Sunday. One which approaches your question about the balance between modern sleekness and the home-spun. I think we would both agree that the modernist box of galleries/museums offers good and bad perceptions of the art experience. It's void, full of potential (like your tabula rasa), yet separated, exclusionary. There exists an in-between, flexible and comfortable, inclusive while still challenging---the exact sort of vision I hold for "Good Stuff House."
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/100cc/100ccb73197269c83c777e9a6c654c319bccbb5b" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/030e2/030e24cd8c935b5d7d517666bd4ed169f084ddad" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/394aa/394aaeb90d1d49597889854c1e4390ef5b6f9b6b" alt=""
The experience is warm and thought-provoking. Just as you interpret someone's personal space as an identifier of his/her character and interests (I've always thought of the home as a place where one "curates" their sense of the world), Home Gallery openly invites viewers to examine the objects on the walls, coffee tables, shelves, pillows, etc. And not only do they welcome you in, but they offer you brunch! (At least this was the case on Sunday.) So as you are sitting on the couch, snacking on grapes, and watching a video play from an old t.v. set on the bookshelf, you also begin noticing the situation. Is that little shoe on the floor also part of the exhibit? What about those drawings on the fridge? It's funny. The container becomes the art, too! And unlike the modernist belief, it is NOT distracting. It is all encompassing and organically contagious---I can't help but look for connections and juxtapositions.
The Diorama Show was particularly playing into those blurred boundaries (perfectly conceptualizing its host: "home" vs. "gallery"), much like I expressed about Gunnatowski's Territory project. Sets within a set everywhere---revealing the stage props of reality as well. The show collected a curious grouping of works, all variations on the diorama. Originally drawn to this exhibit because of my recent work with diorama-like forms, my satisfaction may have been biased, but here are a few images:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/64492/64492bd0a0355ac46b06e1c5b718d4d6bcc257ed" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7f493/7f493887adfc5ee5b03d2f697cbcc1d1c24f7237" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a4003/a40035c6facc99f6a322993b4daba191155ef2d2" alt=""
And the image at the top is a tiny piece by Laura and Andrew hiding in plain sight in their hallway. I might have missed it, if the show hadn't encouraged such detail-looking. (I made C stand next to it for scale.)
Hoping to one day own a home (like you) and a gallery!
k
No comments:
Post a Comment